Most tend to prefer matching desktop to hipfire using 100% mdh paired with a 0% ads /scope. (apex uses it by default , siege added it lately after being petitioned to do so for about a yearĬall of duty used this as its default for a decent amount of time before switching to 1.333 /133% mdv (you can still set it to 0.0000 and get 0% mdh/ mdv)Ī complication with 0% would be matching your desktop to your in game sense which in theory sounds great but doesn't seem to work for many when using 0%

The concept behind 0% matching has multiple names More interestingly, I like how when I searched for ' MDV 0% ADS' and only results came back relevant are all from this site lol And on the other side, I can maybe see the argument on the other side, or even those that want to keep all the cm/360 same for all zooms, as essentially they want to not let a sudden zoom-in cause an adjustment in their movement. On one side, you have 0% which essentially would translates to scaling based on zoom magnification (zoom 2x and move back 2x dist video was cool). While it was interesting, felt like I was going down a rabbit hole of what's better lol. I actually went on a bit of a rampage today reading on the whole 0% coefficient discussion from some of the earlier threads on this forum. 0% coefficient is typically the best place to start, and try higher values if it feels too slow. Scale is to be left at 100% if you want all scopes to have the same relative scaling yes. Some games do have a separate cursor sensitivity, but most do not. Yeah, that's the biggest drawback of using very high DPI.

Battlefront 2 3rd person